Upping their game for the World Cup

The Bayer Turf Solutions team talk to the turf managers at Kingsholm, Gloucester, about hosting World Cup 2015 games

Print page

Of the 13 venues for the Rugby World Cup, Kingsholm in Gloucester, was the only soil pitch.

According to Graeme Balmer, the pitch consultant, this has significant implications. “Maintenance levels are high, especially when it comes to divots coming out from scrummages. We had a large team of eight people divoting at half time and after the game,” says Graeme.

“Over the past few months we’ve had a lot more rainfall, and this could have made the pitch softer, but thankfully we have good drainage here. It’s been tested and it’s in spec,” he says.

Kingsholm was checked against stringent criteria set by the Rugby World Cup organising committee, to ensure that the turf met the specifications for play, including impact testing, sward colour and density, and root zone quality. There were also checks for infiltration and drainage rates.


“Even though the fixtures were set, there was still a contingency for anything that might affect turf quality. It would still have been possible for games to have been delayed or even re-scheduled had play and ground conditions been hampered by factors such as bad weather.

“So, while in many ways the practices we’d had in place for many years still held, I’m not going to deny that we didn’t up our game for the World Cup, because we were in the global spotlight.

Practical changes included applying more fertiliser and upping the iron levels to ensure the turf looked healthy.

“Every fortnight saw the pitch verti-drained with a Wiedenmann Terra Spike, for deep spiking and aeration, with the holes left open.

“One thing we had to watch out for was leaf spot, which was a problem in 2014. We just have to keep an eye on it, and if the need arose, we treated with Interface® fungicide from Bayer,” says Graeme.


Selection process

Kingsholm submitted an application to be considered as a World Cup host four years ago. “We knew the pitch was big enough, the stadium had enough capacity, and that we could cater for the hospitality required. It has enough boxes, has television access, and we have international sized changing rooms.

“The closer we got to the tournament the more criteria we received, which meant we had to make a number of changes to the stadium and pitch. During 2015, a representative working on behalf of the World Cup came to test that the pitch. We were delighted that the turf met their criteria,” says Graeme.


Structural changes

The turf team at Kingsholm had to make some big changes to the pitch to ensure that was fit to showcase to the world’s leading rugby players… and a television audience of millions from around the globe.

Graeme’s brother, Dave Balmer, the stadium manager at Kingsholm, explains that that these changes were huge, but that they were willing to make them for the opportunity to host the tournament.

“We had new international goal posts installed to replace the old posts made in 1964 by a local engineering firm Field and Platt. It’s sad because that’s a piece of history. But the great thing is that these were re-erected in the fan zone area, in Gloucester quays, next to the big screen.

“The new posts are impressive, because they can be folded down to enable us to clean and paint them easily, and will help when we put the dome in during the colder winter months to protect against frost.”

Team Training 

As well as changing the posts, they had to install 50 new lights into the stadium. This brought the total up to 150 lights, all to help TV television presentation.

“We’ve also had to reduce the size of the pitch from 97 metres by 70 metres, with a seven and a half metre in-goal, to 95 metres by 68 metres and in-goals that are six metres deep.

“After the World Cup it will go out to 70 metres wide, and we will put the in-goals back to seven metres, but the length will have to stay the same because we can’t move the goal posts. Now that they’re each in four and a half cubic metres of concrete, it’s fair to say they’re here to stay,” says Dave.

As well as making structural changes, the turf team had to invest in new maintenance kit to ensure the turf met strict criteria set by the World Cup. Dave purchased a new Toro triple mower with boxes, because of the need to up the scale and precision of the mowing, to meet strict grass height stipulations. 

“During the tournament there was pressure to make sure the pitch met criteria throughout, and to keep it looking and playing impeccably. And this was a challenge, especially with three games in one week during September:


  • Saturday 19th September Tonga v Georgia
  • Wednesday 23rd September Scotland v Japan
  • Friday 25th September Argentina v Georgia


In addition, Kingsholm hosted USA v Japan on Sunday 11th October.

World Cup Training 

“It was challenging to maintain the pitch when there were games in such close proximity, because it’s not just the day of the game that you can’t do any maintenance work, it’s also the day before. Both teams have to train for two hours, in what they call a ‘captain’s run’, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. Therefore we lost a recovery window.

“We prepared the pitch for the captain’s runs to the same standard that we prepared for the games, so we were working around these sessions and games, as and when we could,” says Dave.


Renovation works

Kingsholm, like many stadiums, hosts a number of concerts, and this year Madness played on 30th May and Elton John performed on Sunday 7th June. For the concerts, the turf team killed all the grass with a total herbicide, and the ground was covered, so the gigs could be performed.

Following this, on the June 8, the renovation started, they drilled the perennial ryegrass seed, and within two weeks the grass was perfectly well established, and needed to be mowed.

“We had to plan exceptionally well in order to make sure we successfully renovated the pitch for the World Cup. We started right after the last concert and had to mow after two weeks. We then had to implement a strategic fertiliser regime to ensure the pitch looked as good as it did for the tournament,” says Dave.

“Having invested so much time, resource and effort into preparing for the World Cup, it’s absolutely vital that we maintained the health of the turf throughout the tournament. We had the eyes of the world on the pitch, and a lot of reputation to uphold. Built in 1891 (20 years after the creation of the RFU), Kingsholm is one of the oldest stadiums in the UK, and we made sure that its prestige was upheld with a pitch that looked and played as well as possible,” adds Dave.


Pressures for groundsmen during the Rugby World Cup

Graeme and Dave’s comments highlight the pressures the groundsmen preparing for the World Cup faced. Colin Mumford, and Neil Pettican, from the Bayer Turf Solutions team, further discuss the challenges that groundsmen had to overcome during the World Cup 2015 with David Bates from Total Turf Solutions.

David Bates, technical director of the independent sports turf consultancy Total Turf Solutions, is appointed by the Rugby Football Union (RFU) as a consultant to implement a major initiative designed to improve playing surfaces at 'grass roots' level. David knows that the lack of a recovery window was potentially a big challenge during the tournament.

“The football stadiums hosting World Cup games would have certainly lost a recovery window, where there is usually a break in fixtures for renovation, such as aeration, over-seeding and putting covers down to help with germination,” he says.

“The problem would have been the time to do everything they need to, and each head groundsman will have had a different challenge. For rugby grounds like Kingsholm, they also had the added pressure of home games for their own teams. The football stadiums will have had the pressure of alternating between football and rugby matches, and changing markings in real time pressured situations,” says David.

According to Colin Mumford from Bayer, the recovery challenge would have directly impacted by the threat of bad weather. “The pitches would have been constantly (depending on the number of matches) exposed to wear and damage that needed to be repaired and the grass re-established.”

In 2008 and 2009, Colin held the post of technical officer at the New Zealand Sports Turf Institute (NZSTI).  At this time the NZSTI were employed by the 2011 Rugby World Cup organizing committee to evaluate stadia vying to be selected for the 2011 tournament. 

During the evaluation process Colin and colleagues visited grounds, including the Westpac Stadium, in Wellington, to assess a number of turf performance criteria stipulated by the Rugby World Cup.  “Key criteria assessed were: grass composition, surface infiltration and drainage, surface levels, surface hardness and bare patches, and pitches not only had to meet strict measures on total area of bare patches but no single patch could exceed a particular size,” says Colin.

“From my experience I know the pressures groundsmen are under. And adding to the stress is the weather that is generally a lot colder in the UK than New Zealand. At this time of year, the temperatures have dropped, and recovery is slower. If it was a venue that was hosting multiple games, the groundsmen had a lot of work to reinstate the pitch for the next match,” he says.

“Drainage capabilities, soil profile, and irrigation all have to be performing well to ensure the turf had the best chance of standing up to the beating it got, and the lack of recovery time available,” says Colin.

Neil Pettican from Bayer has worked on a number of international class multi sports events at Wembley stadium and knows what a ‘buzz’ they create. He’s in no doubt that the grounds staff would have had to put in all the hours necessary.

“Groundsmen shouldn’t have needed to implement different practices, but the wear and tear was bound to increase, especially for those stadia with six big games in a fortnight, and there were Rugby World Cup games as well as their league fixtures.

“Repairing the pitch, to get it ready for the next game, and the TV cameras, would have been a long process. I’m sure many groundsmen were working under the floodlights to make every hour count. By the end of the Rugby World Cup the ground staff and the pitch would ideally need a well-earned break – unfortunately the structured season will not allow for this. It’s the life of a groundsman, but what an experience the World Cup must have been!”